Prediction of Jule Niemeier [121st] vs Jasmine Paolini [6th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L L L L
Form
W L W W L W W W W LH2H: Niemeier 0 - 2 Paolini
They have played 5 sets in total, with Niemeier winning 1 and Paolini winning 4. The last match between Niemeier and Paolini was at the Transylvania Open - Cluj-Napoca, 14-10-2022, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jule Niemeier | 0 |
| Jasmine Paolini | 2 |
| Niemeier | Stats | Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| 31% (4-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (12-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 121 | Ranking | 6 |
| 61 | Highest Rank | 4 |
| 25 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 13 |
| 58% (212-155) | Career Total W/L | 59% (410-284) |
| $1,645,865 | Career Prize Money | $6,110,570 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
7
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
74 of
119)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
119)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 23 | Games Won | 31 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:6:13 | Average Match Time | 2:6:13 |
| 60% (123/204) | 1st Serve % | 70% (117/168) |
| 61% (75/123) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (70/117) |
| 38% (31/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (28/51) |
| 44% (8/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (12/29) |
| 42% (70/168) | Return Points Win % | 48% (98/204) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jule Niemeier vs Jasmine Paolini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Niemeier 0 - 2 Paolini
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Niemeier has won 39.04% of points on their second serve, while Paolini has won 43.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Niemeier, in recent form, has won 51.82% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paolini has won 49.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.69% and 30.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Niemeier has saved 44.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paolini has saved 45.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Niemeier has won 44.68% of matches played (W/L 21/ 26), with Paolini winning 67.74% (W/L 42/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Niemeier has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 126/ 67), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 38/ 49). Paolini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 213/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 14/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Niemeier has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 8/ 4), where as Paolini has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 15/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Niemeier winning 0 times and Paolini being victorious 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Niemeier winning 1 and Paolini winning 4. The last match between Niemeier and Paolini was at the Transylvania Open - Cluj-Napoca, 14-10-2022, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Niemeier and Paolini have played a deciding set 1 times, with Niemeier winning 0 times and Paolini 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Niemeier winning 0, and Paolini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Niemeier has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.34 while Paolini has played against players with an average rank of 84.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Niemeier has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paolini has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Niemeier has converted 34.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paolini has converted 32.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Jule Niemeier
88%
(
46 of
52)
1st Serve %
129%
(
58 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Jule Niemeier
102%
(
61 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Jule Niemeier
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Jule Niemeier
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Eva Lys
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Jule Niemeier
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Jule Niemeier
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Jule Niemeier
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Maja Chwalinska
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Jasmine Paolini
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Magda Linette
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Naomi Osaka
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
75%
(
12 of
16)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
43%
(
12 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
22
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jaqueline Cristian
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
96)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Iva Jovic
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Jasmine Paolini
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Eva Lys
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Niemeier vs Paolini?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Niemeier Vs Paolini is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (212/155) | Win/Loss | 59% (410/284) |
| 58% (482/355) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (908/721) |
| 53% (4137/3648) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7770/7127) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1296 | Aces Total | 514 |
| 0.54 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2042 | Total Double Faults | 1264 |
| 1:38:4 | Average Match Time | 1:14:20 |
| 216.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 159.02 |
| 56% (13931/24786) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25092/38642) |
| 66% (9216/13904) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14947/25092) |
| 45% (4902/10893) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6338/13546) |
| 47% (1448/3086) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2278/4734) |
| 45% (11200/24697) | Return Points Win % | 46% (17182/37553) |
| 58% (207/357) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (400/684) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (38/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (74/137) |
| 45% (49/109) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (150/249) |
| 86% (225/193) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (370/318) |
| 14% (225/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (370/51) |
| 13% (142/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (323/87) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
